↓ Skip to main content

Contact rates with nesting birds before and after invasive snake removal: estimating the effects of trap-based control

Overview of attention for article published in NeoBiota, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Contact rates with nesting birds before and after invasive snake removal: estimating the effects of trap-based control
Published in
NeoBiota, July 2019
DOI 10.3897/neobiota.49.35592
Authors

Amy A. Yackel Adams, Melia G. Nafus, Page E. Klug, Björn Lardner, M. J. Mazurek, Julie A. Savidge, Robert N. Reed

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Master 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Researcher 2 9%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 30%
Environmental Science 3 13%
Unspecified 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2019.
All research outputs
#9,080,552
of 15,496,449 outputs
Outputs from NeoBiota
#162
of 225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,543
of 260,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeoBiota
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,496,449 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them