↓ Skip to main content

Contribution of Antarctica to past and future sea-level rise

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 48,047)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
532 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
Title
Contribution of Antarctica to past and future sea-level rise
Published in
Nature, March 2016
DOI 10.1038/nature17145
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert M. DeConto, David Pollard, DeConto, Robert M, Pollard, David

Abstract

Polar temperatures over the last several million years have, at times, been slightly warmer than today, yet global mean sea level has been 6-9 metres higher as recently as the Last Interglacial (130,000 to 115,000 years ago) and possibly higher during the Pliocene epoch (about three million years ago). In both cases the Antarctic ice sheet has been implicated as the primary contributor, hinting at its future vulnerability. Here we use a model coupling ice sheet and climate dynamics-including previously underappreciated processes linking atmospheric warming with hydrofracturing of buttressing ice shelves and structural collapse of marine-terminating ice cliffs-that is calibrated against Pliocene and Last Interglacial sea-level estimates and applied to future greenhouse gas emission scenarios. Antarctica has the potential to contribute more than a metre of sea-level rise by 2100 and more than 15 metres by 2500, if emissions continue unabated. In this case atmospheric warming will soon become the dominant driver of ice loss, but prolonged ocean warming will delay its recovery for thousands of years.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 384 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 532 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 21 4%
United Kingdom 6 1%
Germany 5 <1%
Australia 5 <1%
Belgium 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Other 10 2%
Unknown 472 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 150 28%
Researcher 121 23%
Student > Master 80 15%
Student > Bachelor 48 9%
Other 29 5%
Other 96 18%
Unknown 8 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 269 51%
Environmental Science 99 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 7%
Unspecified 24 5%
Engineering 23 4%
Other 71 13%
Unknown 8 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3151. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2017.
All research outputs
#80
of 8,397,727 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#25
of 48,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6
of 279,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#2
of 1,000 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,397,727 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 74.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,000 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.