447 followers
RT @rdlarter: Such high resolution is of critical importance for validating ice sheet models that show major ice loss can occur within a fe…
110 followers
RT @rdlarter: Such high resolution is of critical importance for validating ice sheet models that show major ice loss can occur within a fe…
389 followers
Antartida 2019 _ Alguna perdida imortante de hielos puede ocurrir en algunos ( cientos de años ) . Tendremos que estar atentos que ocurre en los proximos 10 años , hasta 2030 en principio. Info de Cientifico Robert Larter.
1,089 followers
Such high resolution is of critical importance for validating ice sheet models that show major ice loss can occur within a few thousand (or even a few hundred) years. For example https://t.co/WLtsaOGLyP 7/10 https://t.co/RHt4LLR1fR
2,697 followers
RT @NatureEcoEvo: .@wolfgangcramer is concerned about us having consistently underestimated risk of Antarctic deglaciation https://t.co/XCR…
24,299 followers
.@wolfgangcramer is concerned about us having consistently underestimated risk of Antarctic deglaciation https://t.co/XCRJ5GCYyX #EEFLisbon2019
230 followers
@frotograf To https://t.co/xPdhBhCi0j i symulowanie tutaj: https://t.co/N4ixbsKTQp Info o ile do kiedy wzrośnie jest mocno rozproszone. Generalnie wiesz fake-news-alert mode on.
0 followers
@latimeralder @lapogus1 @michaelgove @Ed_Miliband Again, you're ignoring the studies predicting the rate of sea level rise will increase: https://t.co/jVJ9cfLxXB. https://t.co/ZqhbZ22OiD. https://t.co/ulFkA6kAw5….
907 followers
@SaulSchubak @satuhassi Rajaat maalitolpat valitsemalla itse uskottavuuden ja relevantin tulevaisuuden, mutta onhan näitä artikkeleita ollut esim. Sciencessä (IF ~37): https://t.co/3cjkvu4eTN, https://t.co/JBbLhQLA1i ja Naturessa (IF ~42): https://t.co/FJB
1,333 followers
RT @mammuthus: @keithalexander This paper is pretty much the worst case scenario (and unlikely). East Antarctica has 60m of sea level in it…
3,663 followers
@keithalexander This paper is pretty much the worst case scenario (and unlikely). East Antarctica has 60m of sea level in it and literally no one is saying 30m in the next 100 to 200 years https://t.co/ixTNGwR6dZ
3,011 followers
Contribution of Antarctica to past and future sea-level rise | Nature https://t.co/E4l1GJeNTF
362 followers
6,328 followers
RT @MWClimateSci: The paper follows on from DeConto and Pollard 2016 https://t.co/Ggxo18Xd8l, which raised the prospect of rapid and catast…
6,504 followers
The paper follows on from DeConto and Pollard 2016 https://t.co/Ggxo18Xd8l, which raised the prospect of rapid and catastrophic ice loss from Antarctica in the startlingly near term.
22,572 followers
RT @chriscmooney: 3. And on the big debate over marine ice cliffs and how fast they can collapse and cause mega sea level rise: https://t.c…
35,387 followers
3. And on the big debate over marine ice cliffs and how fast they can collapse and cause mega sea level rise: https://t.co/P8e3E1INRD https://t.co/EXvrCuOZvZ
6,700 followers
@GlacierBytes @AGrinsted @snapplanetio Idea from de Conto + Pollard 2016 https://t.co/4agc89BecQ #MICI assumes v high rates of melt + hydrofracture (meltwater drains into crevasses extending them) initiating fast calving retreat + rapid #SeaLevelRise (#sat
70 followers
@brjma Hahahaha, I did in our previous discussion. Your unsubstaniated opinion was that the evidence provided was faked. Check out @mlpinkerton’s Tweet: https://t.co/H6r2bgYKtX
70 followers
@brjma @DoctorKarl Some References below but there are literally thousands out there: https://t.co/hoAdrmDik5 https://t.co/JGKqUJlfVW https://t.co/G8d3xAXduz
1,190 followers
2,067 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
1,097 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
1,813 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
4,857 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
2,994 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
3,207 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
3,096 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
7,278 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
2,851 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
2,550 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
2,851 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
640 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
4,437 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
821 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
2,237 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
615 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
17,867 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
872 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
3,518 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
6,784 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
1,267 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
655 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
2,261 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
178 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
1,847 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
2,937 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
1,368 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
617 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
2,458 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
13,789 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
849 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
7,403 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
13,590 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
119,435 followers
Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of Sea Level Rise by the end of this century. That's double what IPCC said just 5 years ago. Our understanding of the rate of collapse it
890 followers
@MichaelEMann Yes, but even here the rate of sea level rise depends strongly (and I'd say almost linearly) on the forcing. So, even if we pass a threshold the West Antarctic Ice Sheet won't just drop in the ocean. It'll take many hundreds or even thousands
859 followers
DeConto and Pollard suggested SURFACE melt on Antarctic ice-shelves could lead to their break-up which would greatly speed ice-flow into the oceans and much greater sea-level rise https://t.co/DxdGlQVW9z. solar geo would be effective at offsetting this sur
459 followers
“Antarctica has the potential to contribute more than a metre of sea-level rise by 2100 and more than 15 metres by 2500, if emissions continue unabated...” https://t.co/AsBlgTNK0q #ChineseHoax #ClimateChange #climate
1,407 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
576 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
11,904 followers
878 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
395 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
308 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
374 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
289 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
289 followers
108 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
291 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
2,818 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
117 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
1,171 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
903 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
951 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
214 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
431 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
14 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
747 followers
@tan123 "Sea level rise of up to 2m may displace almost 2.5% of the global population" (Rohling et al. 2013). https://t.co/Lw3FQNuVVD
132 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
261 followers
RT @Cedders68: @icarus62 I would hope not as fast as exponential, or if so doubling time not Hansen's worst case: https://t.co/WX9hTo0V8T…
11,279 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
449 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
747 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
734 followers
@icarus62 I would hope not as fast as exponential, or if so doubling time not Hansen's worst case: https://t.co/WX9hTo0V8T https://t.co/f3h1rmBX9F
4,333 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
926 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
53 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
41 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
2,994 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
663 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
5,588 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
1,580 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
247 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
1,972 followers
Still wonder about the odd reticence of the IPCC AR5 (2013) sea level rise estimates. How much was political? https://t.co/4flz2PtBB7
1,941 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
131 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
1,914 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
94 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
119,435 followers
Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely because of DeConto & Pollard @Nature article: https://t.co/VdJgu8CdB6 https://t.co/PS8V19TXBq
689 followers
Contribution of Antarctica to past and future sea-level rise | Nature - https://t.co/FmFs4p5iPi via @Shareaholic