@SaulSchubak @satuhassi Rajaat maalitolpat valitsemalla itse uskottavuuden ja relevantin tulevaisuuden, mutta onhan näitä artikkeleita ollut esim. Sciencessä (IF ~37): https://t.co/3cjkvu4eTN, https://t.co/JBbLhQLA1i ja Naturessa (IF ~42): https://t.co/FJB
RT @mammuthus: @keithalexander This paper is pretty much the worst case scenario (and unlikely). East Antarctica has 60m of sea level in it…
@keithalexander This paper is pretty much the worst case scenario (and unlikely). East Antarctica has 60m of sea level in it and literally no one is saying 30m in the next 100 to 200 years https://t.co/ixTNGwR6dZ
Contribution of Antarctica to past and future sea-level rise | Nature https://t.co/E4l1GJeNTF
RT @MWClimateSci: The paper follows on from DeConto and Pollard 2016 https://t.co/Ggxo18Xd8l, which raised the prospect of rapid and catast…
The paper follows on from DeConto and Pollard 2016 https://t.co/Ggxo18Xd8l, which raised the prospect of rapid and catastrophic ice loss from Antarctica in the startlingly near term.
RT @chriscmooney: 3. And on the big debate over marine ice cliffs and how fast they can collapse and cause mega sea level rise: https://t.c…
RT @chriscmooney: 3. And on the big debate over marine ice cliffs and how fast they can collapse and cause mega sea level rise: https://t.c…
3. And on the big debate over marine ice cliffs and how fast they can collapse and cause mega sea level rise: https://t.co/P8e3E1INRD https://t.co/EXvrCuOZvZ
@GlacierBytes @AGrinsted @snapplanetio Idea from de Conto + Pollard 2016 https://t.co/4agc89BecQ #MICI assumes v high rates of melt + hydrofracture (meltwater drains into crevasses extending them) initiating fast calving retreat + rapid #SeaLevelRise (#sat
@brjma Hahahaha, I did in our previous discussion. Your unsubstaniated opinion was that the evidence provided was faked. Check out @mlpinkerton’s Tweet: https://t.co/H6r2bgYKtX
@brjma @DoctorKarl Some References below but there are literally thousands out there: https://t.co/hoAdrmDik5 https://t.co/JGKqUJlfVW https://t.co/G8d3xAXduz
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of Sea Level Rise by the end of this century. That's double what IPCC said just 5 years ago. Our understanding of the rate of collapse it
@MichaelEMann Yes, but even here the rate of sea level rise depends strongly (and I'd say almost linearly) on the forcing. So, even if we pass a threshold the West Antarctic Ice Sheet won't just drop in the ocean. It'll take many hundreds or even thousands
DeConto and Pollard suggested SURFACE melt on Antarctic ice-shelves could lead to their break-up which would greatly speed ice-flow into the oceans and much greater sea-level rise https://t.co/DxdGlQVW9z. solar geo would be effective at offsetting this sur
“Antarctica has the potential to contribute more than a metre of sea-level rise by 2100 and more than 15 metres by 2500, if emissions continue unabated...” https://t.co/AsBlgTNK0q #ChineseHoax #ClimateChange #climate
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
@tan123 "Sea level rise of up to 2m may displace almost 2.5% of the global population" (Rohling et al. 2013). https://t.co/Lw3FQNuVVD
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
RT @Cedders68: @icarus62 I would hope not as fast as exponential, or if so doubling time not Hansen's worst case: https://t.co/WX9hTo0V8T…
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
@icarus62 I would hope not as fast as exponential, or if so doubling time not Hansen's worst case: https://t.co/WX9hTo0V8T https://t.co/f3h1rmBX9F
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
Still wonder about the odd reticence of the IPCC AR5 (2013) sea level rise estimates. How much was political? https://t.co/4flz2PtBB7
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely because of DeConto & Pollard @Nature article: https://t.co/VdJgu8CdB6 https://t.co/PS8V19TXBq
Contribution of Antarctica to past and future sea-level rise | Nature - https://t.co/FmFs4p5iPi via @Shareaholic
@RogerPielkeJr Here's a quote which is outdated, and a post-ar5 paper: https://t.co/ktw8yByoiO https://t.co/ugrcMg9rBI
RT @RachelLicker: 6. There is an enormous list of studies relevant to Judge Alsup’s request. So, here are just a few more: https://t.co/ijq…
RT @RachelLicker: 6. There is an enormous list of studies relevant to Judge Alsup’s request. So, here are just a few more: https://t.co/ijq…
RT @RachelLicker: 6. There is an enormous list of studies relevant to Judge Alsup’s request. So, here are just a few more: https://t.co/ijq…
RT @RachelLicker: 6. There is an enormous list of studies relevant to Judge Alsup’s request. So, here are just a few more: https://t.co/ijq…