136 followers
@MWClimateSci but mostly the talk is about understanding the controversy and subsequent ideas about the most-cited paleo nature paper by DeConto and Pollard https://t.co/9IWBBN3DwR
447 followers
RT @rdlarter: Such high resolution is of critical importance for validating ice sheet models that show major ice loss can occur within a fe…
120 followers
RT @rdlarter: Such high resolution is of critical importance for validating ice sheet models that show major ice loss can occur within a fe…
389 followers
Antartida 2019 _ Alguna perdida imortante de hielos puede ocurrir en algunos ( cientos de años ) . Tendremos que estar atentos que ocurre en los proximos 10 años , hasta 2030 en principio. Info de Cientifico Robert Larter.
1,168 followers
Such high resolution is of critical importance for validating ice sheet models that show major ice loss can occur within a few thousand (or even a few hundred) years. For example https://t.co/WLtsaOGLyP 7/10 https://t.co/RHt4LLR1fR
2,892 followers
RT @NatureEcoEvo: .@wolfgangcramer is concerned about us having consistently underestimated risk of Antarctic deglaciation https://t.co/XCR…
25,263 followers
.@wolfgangcramer is concerned about us having consistently underestimated risk of Antarctic deglaciation https://t.co/XCRJ5GCYyX #EEFLisbon2019
230 followers
@frotograf To https://t.co/xPdhBhCi0j i symulowanie tutaj: https://t.co/N4ixbsKTQp Info o ile do kiedy wzrośnie jest mocno rozproszone. Generalnie wiesz fake-news-alert mode on.
0 followers
@latimeralder @lapogus1 @michaelgove @Ed_Miliband Again, you're ignoring the studies predicting the rate of sea level rise will increase: https://t.co/jVJ9cfLxXB. https://t.co/ZqhbZ22OiD. https://t.co/ulFkA6kAw5….
1,009 followers
@SaulSchubak @satuhassi Rajaat maalitolpat valitsemalla itse uskottavuuden ja relevantin tulevaisuuden, mutta onhan näitä artikkeleita ollut esim. Sciencessä (IF ~37): https://t.co/3cjkvu4eTN, https://t.co/JBbLhQLA1i ja Naturessa (IF ~42): https://t.co/FJB
1,435 followers
RT @mammuthus: @keithalexander This paper is pretty much the worst case scenario (and unlikely). East Antarctica has 60m of sea level in it…
3,739 followers
@keithalexander This paper is pretty much the worst case scenario (and unlikely). East Antarctica has 60m of sea level in it and literally no one is saying 30m in the next 100 to 200 years https://t.co/ixTNGwR6dZ
3,022 followers
Contribution of Antarctica to past and future sea-level rise | Nature https://t.co/E4l1GJeNTF
365 followers
6,446 followers
RT @MWClimateSci: The paper follows on from DeConto and Pollard 2016 https://t.co/Ggxo18Xd8l, which raised the prospect of rapid and catast…
6,651 followers
The paper follows on from DeConto and Pollard 2016 https://t.co/Ggxo18Xd8l, which raised the prospect of rapid and catastrophic ice loss from Antarctica in the startlingly near term.
22,639 followers
RT @chriscmooney: 3. And on the big debate over marine ice cliffs and how fast they can collapse and cause mega sea level rise: https://t.c…
36,378 followers
3. And on the big debate over marine ice cliffs and how fast they can collapse and cause mega sea level rise: https://t.co/P8e3E1INRD https://t.co/EXvrCuOZvZ
7,061 followers
@GlacierBytes @AGrinsted @snapplanetio Idea from de Conto + Pollard 2016 https://t.co/4agc89BecQ #MICI assumes v high rates of melt + hydrofracture (meltwater drains into crevasses extending them) initiating fast calving retreat + rapid #SeaLevelRise (#sat
82 followers
@brjma Hahahaha, I did in our previous discussion. Your unsubstaniated opinion was that the evidence provided was faked. Check out @mlpinkerton’s Tweet: https://t.co/H6r2bgYKtX
82 followers
@brjma @DoctorKarl Some References below but there are literally thousands out there: https://t.co/hoAdrmDik5 https://t.co/JGKqUJlfVW https://t.co/G8d3xAXduz
1,363 followers
2,087 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
1,149 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
1,866 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
5,068 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
3,061 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
3,332 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
3,147 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
7,278 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
3,206 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
2,800 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
2,907 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
651 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
4,437 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
1,013 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
2,661 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
610 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
18,687 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
881 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
3,531 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
6,625 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
1,264 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
619 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
2,261 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
190 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
2,020 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
3,099 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
1,427 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
648 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
2,537 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
15,590 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
1,020 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
7,596 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
14,011 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
132,109 followers
Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of Sea Level Rise by the end of this century. That's double what IPCC said just 5 years ago. Our understanding of the rate of collapse it
987 followers
@MichaelEMann Yes, but even here the rate of sea level rise depends strongly (and I'd say almost linearly) on the forcing. So, even if we pass a threshold the West Antarctic Ice Sheet won't just drop in the ocean. It'll take many hundreds or even thousands
911 followers
DeConto and Pollard suggested SURFACE melt on Antarctic ice-shelves could lead to their break-up which would greatly speed ice-flow into the oceans and much greater sea-level rise https://t.co/DxdGlQVW9z. solar geo would be effective at offsetting this sur
471 followers
“Antarctica has the potential to contribute more than a metre of sea-level rise by 2100 and more than 15 metres by 2500, if emissions continue unabated...” https://t.co/AsBlgTNK0q #ChineseHoax #ClimateChange #climate
1,465 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
667 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
11,927 followers
956 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
434 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
314 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
374 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
289 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
289 followers
116 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
302 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
3,151 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
125 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
1,171 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
1,002 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
950 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
211 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
529 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
14 followers
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
778 followers
@tan123 "Sea level rise of up to 2m may displace almost 2.5% of the global population" (Rohling et al. 2013). https://t.co/Lw3FQNuVVD
132 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
267 followers
RT @Cedders68: @icarus62 I would hope not as fast as exponential, or if so doubling time not Hansen's worst case: https://t.co/WX9hTo0V8T…
11,469 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
452 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
778 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
793 followers
@icarus62 I would hope not as fast as exponential, or if so doubling time not Hansen's worst case: https://t.co/WX9hTo0V8T https://t.co/f3h1rmBX9F
4,498 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
926 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
52 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
41 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
3,061 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
697 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
5,267 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
1,603 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
253 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
2,151 followers
Still wonder about the odd reticence of the IPCC AR5 (2013) sea level rise estimates. How much was political? https://t.co/4flz2PtBB7
1,930 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
133 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
1,987 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
96 followers
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
132,109 followers
Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely because of DeConto & Pollard @Nature article: https://t.co/VdJgu8CdB6 https://t.co/PS8V19TXBq