@twilamoon @ArchaeoHacker @ClimateCentral Apart from specific local examples (e.g. NYC or Miami), @IceDoctorD recently suggested using DeConto and Pollard (https://t.co/TXEWDme5xp) to explore sea level rise by 2100 versus 2500 --> and what that means fo
@Tessa_M_Hill I guess they aren’t that recent, but I’m partial to papers that go beyond 2100 projections and connect future dynamics and equilibrium to what we’ve seen in the deep past. Golledge et al, 2015 https://t.co/6hIVA3fFpX DeConto and Pollard, 2
That's from a 2013 report. Updated estimates from 2016 point to 2m by 2100, 3m by 2125, and 15m by 2500. The West Antarctic ice sheet is sloughing ice faster than expected. https://t.co/aqzPRrpkB2
@Capobianco2005C @Nicola_Bressi 2) - Contribution of Antarctica to past and future sea-level rise https://t.co/OT9BrmMYxf 3) Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction https://t.co/0Xe0Vntymk
RT @ayanaeliza: While we have commitment issue with climate solutions, we are in a committed long-term relationship with #SeaLevelRise. We'…
RT @ayanaeliza: While we have commitment issue with climate solutions, we are in a committed long-term relationship with #SeaLevelRise. We'…
RT @ayanaeliza: While we have commitment issue with climate solutions, we are in a committed long-term relationship with #SeaLevelRise. We'…
RT @ayanaeliza: While we have commitment issue with climate solutions, we are in a committed long-term relationship with #SeaLevelRise. We'…
RT @ayanaeliza: While we have commitment issue with climate solutions, we are in a committed long-term relationship with #SeaLevelRise. We'…
RT @ayanaeliza: While we have commitment issue with climate solutions, we are in a committed long-term relationship with #SeaLevelRise. We'…
RT @ayanaeliza: While we have commitment issue with climate solutions, we are in a committed long-term relationship with #SeaLevelRise. We'…
RT @ayanaeliza: While we have commitment issue with climate solutions, we are in a committed long-term relationship with #SeaLevelRise. We'…
RT @ayanaeliza: While we have commitment issue with climate solutions, we are in a committed long-term relationship with #SeaLevelRise. We'…
RT @ayanaeliza: While we have commitment issue with climate solutions, we are in a committed long-term relationship with #SeaLevelRise. We'…
RT @ayanaeliza: While we have commitment issue with climate solutions, we are in a committed long-term relationship with #SeaLevelRise. We'…
RT @ayanaeliza: While we have commitment issue with climate solutions, we are in a committed long-term relationship with #SeaLevelRise. We'…
While we have commitment issue with climate solutions, we are in a committed long-term relationship with #SeaLevelRise. We're talking meters folks, not centimeters. Excerpt from paper titled "Contribution of Antarctica to past and future sea-level rise."
@MWClimateSci but mostly the talk is about understanding the controversy and subsequent ideas about the most-cited paleo nature paper by DeConto and Pollard https://t.co/9IWBBN3DwR
RT @rdlarter: Such high resolution is of critical importance for validating ice sheet models that show major ice loss can occur within a fe…
RT @rdlarter: Such high resolution is of critical importance for validating ice sheet models that show major ice loss can occur within a fe…
Antartida 2019 _ Alguna perdida imortante de hielos puede ocurrir en algunos ( cientos de años ) . Tendremos que estar atentos que ocurre en los proximos 10 años , hasta 2030 en principio. Info de Cientifico Robert Larter.
Such high resolution is of critical importance for validating ice sheet models that show major ice loss can occur within a few thousand (or even a few hundred) years. For example https://t.co/WLtsaOGLyP 7/10 https://t.co/RHt4LLR1fR
RT @NatureEcoEvo: .@wolfgangcramer is concerned about us having consistently underestimated risk of Antarctic deglaciation https://t.co/XCR…
.@wolfgangcramer is concerned about us having consistently underestimated risk of Antarctic deglaciation https://t.co/XCRJ5GCYyX #EEFLisbon2019
@frotograf To https://t.co/xPdhBhCi0j i symulowanie tutaj: https://t.co/N4ixbsKTQp Info o ile do kiedy wzrośnie jest mocno rozproszone. Generalnie wiesz fake-news-alert mode on.
@latimeralder @lapogus1 @michaelgove @Ed_Miliband Again, you're ignoring the studies predicting the rate of sea level rise will increase: https://t.co/jVJ9cfLxXB. https://t.co/ZqhbZ22OiD. https://t.co/ulFkA6kAw5….
@SaulSchubak @satuhassi Rajaat maalitolpat valitsemalla itse uskottavuuden ja relevantin tulevaisuuden, mutta onhan näitä artikkeleita ollut esim. Sciencessä (IF ~37): https://t.co/3cjkvu4eTN, https://t.co/JBbLhQLA1i ja Naturessa (IF ~42): https://t.co/FJB
RT @mammuthus: @keithalexander This paper is pretty much the worst case scenario (and unlikely). East Antarctica has 60m of sea level in it…
@keithalexander This paper is pretty much the worst case scenario (and unlikely). East Antarctica has 60m of sea level in it and literally no one is saying 30m in the next 100 to 200 years https://t.co/ixTNGwR6dZ
Contribution of Antarctica to past and future sea-level rise | Nature https://t.co/E4l1GJeNTF
RT @MWClimateSci: The paper follows on from DeConto and Pollard 2016 https://t.co/Ggxo18Xd8l, which raised the prospect of rapid and catast…
The paper follows on from DeConto and Pollard 2016 https://t.co/Ggxo18Xd8l, which raised the prospect of rapid and catastrophic ice loss from Antarctica in the startlingly near term.
@GlacierBytes @AGrinsted @snapplanetio Idea from de Conto + Pollard 2016 https://t.co/4agc89BecQ #MICI assumes v high rates of melt + hydrofracture (meltwater drains into crevasses extending them) initiating fast calving retreat + rapid #SeaLevelRise (#sat
@brjma Hahahaha, I did in our previous discussion. Your unsubstaniated opinion was that the evidence provided was faked. Check out @mlpinkerton’s Tweet: https://t.co/H6r2bgYKtX
@brjma @DoctorKarl Some References below but there are literally thousands out there: https://t.co/hoAdrmDik5 https://t.co/JGKqUJlfVW https://t.co/G8d3xAXduz
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
RT @MichaelEMann: Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of…
Andreas--not true. Read our @PNAS article and the underlying work by DeConto and Pollard. We could easily see 6-8 feet of Sea Level Rise by the end of this century. That's double what IPCC said just 5 years ago. Our understanding of the rate of collapse it
@MichaelEMann Yes, but even here the rate of sea level rise depends strongly (and I'd say almost linearly) on the forcing. So, even if we pass a threshold the West Antarctic Ice Sheet won't just drop in the ocean. It'll take many hundreds or even thousands
DeConto and Pollard suggested SURFACE melt on Antarctic ice-shelves could lead to their break-up which would greatly speed ice-flow into the oceans and much greater sea-level rise https://t.co/DxdGlQVW9z. solar geo would be effective at offsetting this sur
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
RT @Antarcticacl: #Antartica podría contribuir >1m a alza de #NivelDelMar al 2100 y en más de >15m al 2500. #CambioClimatico https://t.co/S…
@tan123 "Sea level rise of up to 2m may displace almost 2.5% of the global population" (Rohling et al. 2013). https://t.co/Lw3FQNuVVD
RT @Cedders68: @icarus62 I would hope not as fast as exponential, or if so doubling time not Hansen's worst case: https://t.co/WX9hTo0V8T…
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…
RT @MichaelEMann: Projections out to 2100 are now doubled relative to AR5 (2+ meters instead of 1, ie 6-8 feet rather than 3), largely beca…