↓ Skip to main content

Increased similarity of neural responses to experienced and empathic distress in costly altruism

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
93 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Increased similarity of neural responses to experienced and empathic distress in costly altruism
Published in
Scientific Reports, July 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-47196-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine O’Connell, Kristin M. Brethel-Haurwitz, Shawn A. Rhoads, Elise M. Cardinale, Kruti M. Vekaria, Emily L. Robertson, Brian Walitt, John W. VanMeter, Abigail A. Marsh

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 93 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 30%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 15%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 9 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 38%
Neuroscience 6 13%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 17 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2020.
All research outputs
#471,435
of 21,467,744 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#5,388
of 114,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,168
of 281,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,467,744 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 114,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them