You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Trainee Thoracic Surgery Social Media Network: Early Experience With TweetChat-Based Journal Clubs
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, January 2020
Tamara Ni hIci, Michael Archer, Caitlin Harrington, Jessica G.Y. Luc, Mara B. Antonoff
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||9||69%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||1||8%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||8%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||3||10%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||2||7%|
|Student > Bachelor||2||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||11||38%|
|Sports and Recreations||2||7%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||1||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2020.
All research outputs
of 23,153,184 outputs
Outputs from The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
of 7,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 456,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,184 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.