↓ Skip to main content

Trainee Thoracic Surgery Social Media Network: Early Experience With TweetChat-Based Journal Clubs

Overview of attention for article published in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Trainee Thoracic Surgery Social Media Network: Early Experience With TweetChat-Based Journal Clubs
Published in
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, January 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.05.083
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tamara Ni hIci, Michael Archer, Caitlin Harrington, Jessica G.Y. Luc, Mara B. Antonoff

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 22%
Professor 3 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,722,248
of 17,067,437 outputs
Outputs from The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
#336
of 6,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,051
of 266,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
#14
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,067,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.