@Allan22810361 @BuckCllr @statsjamie No it wasn't. The Roman warm period was regional, not global, and was not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" -Neukom et al 2019 https:/
@claudiogay4 @David_E8 @RAM_meteo @ame_asociacion @Divulgameteo @climatologia_ua @GeografiaUmu @GeografiaUa @MeteoChatSE @JoannaIvars @aeclim No hay pruebas de periodos cálidos y fríos a escala mundial durante la era preindustrial https://t.co/I4NX3kvmBK
@Camburnclimate @GlennCarr6 @WaltonFA @_ClimateCraze @priscian No, when the proxy data is correlated it shows the MWP was not global and was not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era"
@Luegendetektor @KeineAh18060249 @Moncher71221584 Wie immer keine Sachkritik, sondern nur Lügen, weil Sie wissenschaftl. Erkenntnisse (s. Pages2K, Marcott, Mann etc.) leugnen. Und es wurde nichts weggebügelt, Ihr MWP war nur nicht global, Kohle-Troll. http
Finding "no evidence" is not finding "evidence". Let me assure you that if you start out with the intention of not finding evidence, you won't find it. The problem is Dan, there are people out there who, for reasons not clear to me, get their rocks off
@GerardAMorrow "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" Neukom, et al (2019) https://t.co/ZPY0NqboWO https://t.co/ODLMBNdF5f
@Camburnclimate @GlennCarr6 @WaltonFA @_ClimateCraze @priscian Not globally coherent
@Luegendetektor @VolkerErb @mathemitjulian @KeineAh18060249 @Moncher71221584 Hören Sie auf zu lügen, Kohle-Troll. Sie liefern entsprechend für Ihre Lügen ja auch nie Belege - geht ja auch nicht. https://t.co/vCiNmHfB9Z Es gab auch keine "guten Zeiten" - e
RT @Ceist8: @JRHCBM @warwick512 @MayaOfAuckland The Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today. "No evidence for gl…
@saveme20749471 @nonAlliPetihW @solarpapst @OurWorldInData Warum lügen Sie? https://t.co/Sj1WDVORRF https://t.co/Oj4VXLPigK Sie haben nicht mal verstanden, wie solche Rekonstruktionen gehen. Sie langweilen mich. Wenn Sie denselben Quark nur noch wiederh
RT @Ceist8: @JRHCBM @warwick512 @MayaOfAuckland The Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today. "No evidence for gl…
@JRHCBM @warwick512 @MayaOfAuckland The Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" https://t.co/d776VvzAH6 https://t.co/eScul974FP
@BernhardGeyer Gibt noch andere Probleme: 1. Teilweise wurden ganze Gebiete, teilweise nur eine Höhle untersucht 2. Kein Peer-Review, keine Publikation 3. Keine Methoden-Beschreibung Wurde aber wissenschaftl. untersucht: https://t.co/Sj1WDVPpHd (s. auch
@agentsinaction @saveme20749471 @nonAlliPetihW @solarpapst @OurWorldInData The MWP was NOT global & was not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" -Neukom et al 2019 https
@saveme20749471 @nonAlliPetihW @solarpapst @OurWorldInData 4. Kein zeitlicher Zusammenhang: Studien beziehen sich auf unterschiedliche Zeitbereiche Der Aussagewert ist also 0. Ein Paper, was eben das macht, kommt zum Ergebnis, dass das MWP nicht global wa
@scubadang722 @Chrisdebois1 @sporglefork It wasn’t an ice age, dumbass. And no amount of displaying the international symbol of right wing douche bag will make it so. https://t.co/W9mfjaI5ef
@OyVeyIzhMir @_ClimateCraze Post a study, not a blog. Such as… https://t.co/W9mfjaI5ef
@Jack_1906 @FrankfurtZack Haben Sie nicht. Und es wird selbstverständlich auch noch immer daran geforscht. https://t.co/XFM5lfbpKu
@PachnerTom @Jack_1906 @FrankfurtZack Den Unterschied zw. lokal und global also nicht verstanden. https://t.co/XFM5lfbpKu
@maxihasi1 @Jack_1906 @FrankfurtZack Und nicht global. https://t.co/XFM5lfaRUW
@Notmycircus56 @Jack_1906 @FrankfurtZack Schreiben Sie nicht so einen Stuss. https://t.co/Sj1WDVPpHd War weder global noch so warm wie heute. Aber klar, eine tumbe Verschwörungsgeschichte klingt da immer besser.
@MPMVerm @scruztiger @jpgcrowley @BatcaveSlimer @Diver_Flemming @MatthewWielicki @TheDisproof Ad hominem is a tacit admission that you acknowledge that you are wrong you can't refute the papers. https://t.co/SBDrSLFJIv
@SpartanSnow35 @JunkScience Your video doesn't agree with you about the LIA. They note that it wasn't global. The Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the p
@SpartanSnow35 @reub5ter @JunkScience @socratesccost @CommunityNotes Oops you’re wrong: https://t.co/7WhPL5HZuy
@AlfonsoScoma @JunkScience Not the oil lobbyists. https://t.co/qLBQ7llqSF
@KAkosombo @TonyClimate Indeed. Sorry, I meant to cite the study https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL
@germanniag @StahlmannRolf Es wird nicht wahrer mit bunten Bildchen. https://t.co/YH9VcoeVt2
@WayneBStoltenb1 @TonyClimate No weren't not. Agreed this is a good temperature if we could be sure it wasn't going to keep going past 2 or 3C https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL https://t.co/zZr695DejI
@vzaitsevlaw @RederRaiRai @elonmusk Not globally warm everywhere at the same time. All the other proxy research studies (65 now) find the same hockey stick. You lack knowledge https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
@Marko_Tap @MinnaMkinen6 1/2 Mitään globaalia pientä jääkautta ei nykyisen lämpötilahistoriatutkimuksen mukaan ole ollut olemassa, joten nyt menossa oleva globaali lämpeneminen ei ole palautumista siitä: https://t.co/E8c3zM36rr https://t.co/2TPXgSHTIa
@AngstromU @ItsTheAtmospher @CO2Coalition That's not global, is it? Neukom, 2019 is. https://t.co/pYcQYft9qL
@Gisi24509 @climacritic Ci si potrebbe domandare come mai l'autore, che ha dimostrato altre volte di conoscere questi studi, li nasconda sistematicamente nascondendosi dietro a ipotesi vecchie di 35 anni e più. Qui un altro esempio di ricostruzione recent
@StahlmannRolf @MrJonasDanner Oder hier 🤷🏼 https://t.co/I9F6gsMbTH
@FuturesPicks @AlexEpstein @yaronbrook You're not a science guy, are you. In science peer reviewed scientific papers > lay social media community notes, and by a very large margin. Here's another of the dozens of peer reviewed scientific papers showin
@NorbertNozy @Teoli2003 @monkey449 @curryja Those were small blips and not globally warm all at the same time https://t.co/qLBQ7llqSF
@doom37455413 @TheOmeg55211733 @LockwoodIngers1 @TonyClimate There are not hundreds of peer reviewed papers that say those periods were global. In fact I doubt you can cite one. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustri
@LucMangnus @Mynameismud09 @NMohob @wideawake_media Norway is not the world. Regional is not global. Medieval and Roman warm periods were not warmer *globally* than the current period. You are the one without any evidence for your claims. https://t.co/k6
@CryptoPlissken @Kootenaybob0 @CO2Coalition @FriendsOScience Contrary to what many AGW deniers claim, the Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindust
RT @Ceist8: @Kootenaybob0 @CO2Coalition @FriendsOScience The MWP was NOT global & was not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally co…
@Kootenaybob0 @CO2Coalition @FriendsOScience The MWP was NOT global & was not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" -Neukom et al 2019 https://t.co/d776VvzAH6 Th ht
@icebergerjager @JenniPitko 1/2 Tutustupa sinä itse ajantasaiseen ilmastohistoriaan, joka kertoo sinulle, että mitään globaalia pientä jääkautta ei ole ollut olemassa, eikä nyt menossa oleva globaali lämpeneminen ole siten palautumista siitä: https://t.co/
@GaetanoCriscen2 @Giulio_Firenze Salve, in realta sono distinti eccome. Lo si vede dal grafico sopra, lo si vede da questo studio. https://t.co/O2vIX1JFUE
@Giulio_Firenze su questo argomento, segnalo anche: https://t.co/ejKahS7NBs
@Al_Gorelioni @GrahamLKeegan Meanwhile back on planet earth, again dozens of peer-reviewed scientific studies have created “hockey sticks”: https://t.co/2sYlfjpYrv Here's a hockey stick published in 2019: https://t.co/jgo2HIslHW https://t.co/UbjUA4wQHW
@GeorgeSchulte @AdamBandt I didn't ignore your graphs at all. What paper is that temperature reconstruction from? Here's a third paper from a highly respected and long standing journal for you to reject https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL https://t.co/nLFsc1JgKk
@TonyClimate @GOP He didn't erase anything Tony. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL
@GrahamLKeegan Regional phenomena, not global. “No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era”. Neukom et al 2019 https://t.co/u4UBTV8I6T
@TherealCurtJ @TonyClimate I think you're misinformed https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL https://t.co/xhynz6DSAq
@JaredJMccracken @akaelwopo1 @CO2Coalition 1. This paper refers to one region 2. https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL 3. I accept the findings of this research
@CWebbe @JunkScience No, at least not globally. https://t.co/Sj1WDVORRF https://t.co/Oj4VXLPigK
@JaredJMccracken @akaelwopo1 @CO2Coalition Here’s a graph showing global proxy data for the last two thousand years published in Nature (just as long standing and respected as Science) https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL https://t.co/WpnzIsIGzO
RT @Ceist8: @CO2Coalition @CO2Coalition The Medieval Warm Period was NOT global & was not warmer than today. "No evidence fo…
@CO2Coalition @CO2Coalition The Medieval Warm Period was NOT global & was not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" -Neukom et al 2019 https://t.co/d776VvzA
9/16 De novo, em 2019, utilizando proxys espalhados pelo mundo, um artigo na @Nature mostrou que não há evidência concreta de que o clima GLOBAL estava mais quente ou mais frio na era medieval. https://t.co/xBMSptSLyi
@Neffton1 @StahlmannRolf Lassen Sie mich raten. Selbstdenker, stimmt's? https://t.co/ufowGi8V86
RT @Ceist8: @MrSalvenStadl @Royalacresrod Contrary to what many AGW deniers claim, the Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer…
@MrSalvenStadl @Royalacresrod Contrary to what many AGW deniers claim, the Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" -Neukom e
@philhuwedwards @JohnMashey @RARohde @john_p_rafferty 'Personal interpretation' does not pass muster. The essential point is to analyse the spatiotemporal coherency. Just looking at a collection of papers, each about an individual (!) area... only suggest
@philhuwedwards @JohnMashey @RARohde @john_p_rafferty No, your second sentence is completely at odds with the scientific findings. Neukom 2019: https://t.co/jcnKaUFEbZ https://t.co/rbwWCHqVCz
@philhuwedwards @JohnMashey @RARohde @john_p_rafferty So some regions were colder, some regions warmer... As it happens since _regional_ climate tends to show more variability than the global average. Distinguishing feature of the CURRENT man-made warming
@philhuwedwards @JohnMashey @RARohde @john_p_rafferty I don't think 'Wiki' is a scientific publication, isn't it? Those years are way to handwaving. The actual analysis is in the Neukom et al 2019 publication in Nature: https://t.co/jcnKaUFEbZ https://t.
@philhuwedwards @JohnMashey @RARohde @john_p_rafferty But those were not globally coherent warm (or cold), at the same time as Greenland. Please see Neukom 2019 about this: https://t.co/jcnKaUFEbZ
@ute_lias @PauliVahtera 1/2 Nykyisen lämpötilahistoriatutkimuksen mukaan mitään globaalia pientä jääkautta ei ole ollut olemassa, joten nyt menossa oleva lämpeneminen ei ole mitään "palautumista" siitä. Ja jos tosiaan uskot, että viikinkiaikana Grönlanniss
@Tigercuddles74 @GMB In the last 2000 years there has never been a planet-wide change in climate (including The Little Ice Age) but now there is. That and the speed of change is the difference. If you think this is wrong I look forward to reading your reb
@Markus2vara @JonneKorhonen1 @Demarit @MarinSanna Nykyisen lämpötilahistoriatutkimuksen mukaan mitään globaalia "mini jääkautta" ei ole ollut olemassa: https://t.co/gWVbDb1bmx https://t.co/k4VoJaXjSw
@KorlDa @Klimakatastroph Korl, nein. Warum? ⬇️ https://t.co/BH1LnIbuOr
@Ylikessu @KalleKaasujalka 2/2 ... pois. Nykyisen lämpötilahistoriatutkimuksen mukaan mitään globaalia pientä jääkautta ei ole ollut olemassa: https://t.co/gWVbDb1bmx https://t.co/IcrMBRmqFx
@RomanLasota @VolkerErb Und wieder weiter mit dem Wissenschaftsleugnen und den Strohmännern, weil Sie komplett ahnungslos und "quer" sind. Es gab die MWP, aber sie war nicht global (https://t.co/Sj1WDVPpHd). Sie haben den Unterschied zw. lokal und global n
@bargar_s24084 @DawnTJ90 @DrJamesEHansen @NASAGISS @NASAClimate GISTEMP only goes back to 1880, Berkeley Earth, NOAA and HadCRUT go back to 1850. They had several thousand weather stations globally back then and there was water temperature data taken by t
@PaulRobEsq @youpieceofsilva @RyanMaue Boy have I ever! That's why I know your screenshots are as worthless as you are. Now pay close attention- unlike uneducated and pathetic deniers, I show my sources. https://t.co/pYcQYftHgj https://t.co/BQRYuSGmhr