You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Massage and touch for dementia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004989.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Niels Viggo Hansen, Torben Jørgensen, Lisbeth Ørtenblad |
| Abstract |
Massage and touch have been suggested as a non-pharmacological alternative or supplement to other treatments offered in order to reduce or manage a range of conditions associated with dementia such as anxiety, agitated behaviour and depression. It has also been suggested that massage and touch may counteract cognitive decline. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 330 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Iceland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 319 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 46 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 52 | 16% |
| Unknown | 98 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 81 | 25% |
| Psychology | 43 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 38 | 12% |
| Unknown | 105 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,341,352
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,848
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,290
of 84,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.