↓ Skip to main content

Reliability of hospital scores for the Cancer Patient Experience Survey: analysis of publicly reported patient survey data

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reliability of hospital scores for the Cancer Patient Experience Survey: analysis of publicly reported patient survey data
Published in
BMJ Open, July 2019
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029037
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gary A Abel, Mayam Gomez-Cano, Tra My Pham, Georgios Lyratzopoulos

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 67%
Researcher 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 33%
Unspecified 1 33%
Mathematics 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2019.
All research outputs
#10,922,845
of 13,740,867 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#10,713
of 12,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,881
of 249,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#724
of 975 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,740,867 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 975 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.