You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The comorbidity burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus: patterns, clusters and predictions from a large English primary care cohort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-019-1373-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Magdalena Nowakowska, Salwa S. Zghebi, Darren M. Ashcroft, Iain Buchan, Carolyn Chew-Graham, Tim Holt, Christian Mallen, Harm Van Marwijk, Niels Peek, Rafael Perera-Salazar, David Reeves, Martin K. Rutter, Stephen F. Weng, Nadeem Qureshi, Mamas A. Mamas, Evangelos Kontopantelis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 26 | 34% |
| United States | 12 | 16% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Comoros | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 22 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 45% |
| Scientists | 28 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 420 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 420 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 52 | 12% |
| Researcher | 45 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 10% |
| Other | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 11% |
| Unknown | 173 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 55 | 13% |
| Unknown | 198 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2023.
All research outputs
#587,610
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#429
of 4,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,127
of 360,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#7
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.