You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The impact of conditional cash transfers on health outcomes and use of health services in low and middle income countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008137 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mylene Lagarde, Andy Haines, Natasha Palmer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 887 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 1% |
| Unknown | 855 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 188 | 21% |
| Researcher | 137 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 97 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 71 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 53 | 6% |
| Other | 161 | 18% |
| Unknown | 180 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 210 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 144 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 89 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 65 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 3% |
| Other | 117 | 13% |
| Unknown | 231 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,407,975
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,012
of 13,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,981
of 107,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.