| Title |
Post-event debriefings during neonatal care: why are we not doing them, and how can we start?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Perinatology, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/jp.2016.42 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
T Sawyer, D Loren, L P Halamek |
| Abstract |
Post-event debriefings are a foundational behavior of high performing teams. Despite the inherent value of post-event debriefings, the frequency with which they are used in neonatal care is extremely low. If post-event debriefings are so beneficial, why aren't they conducted more frequently? The reasons are many, but solutions are available. In this report, we provide practical advice on conducting post-event debriefing in neonatal care. In addition, we examine the perceived barriers to conducting post-event debriefings, and offer strategies to overcome them. Finally, we consider opportunities to foster a culture change within neonatal care which integrates debriefing as standard daily work. By establishing a safety culture in neonatal care that encourages and facilitates effective post-event debriefings, patient safety can be enhanced and clinical outcomes can be improved.Journal of Perinatology advance online publication, 31 March 2016; doi:10.1038/jp.2016.42. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| France | 1 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| Ireland | 1 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 21% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 18% |
| Unknown | 26 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 18% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 34 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2016.
All research outputs
#2,313,193
of 24,637,659 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Perinatology
#311
of 2,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,224
of 306,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Perinatology
#9
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,637,659 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,835 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.