↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Critical thermal limits of Poecilia caucana (Steindachner, 1880) (Cyprinodontiformes: Poeciliidae)

Overview of attention for article published in Neotropical Ichthyology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Facebook Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Critical thermal limits of Poecilia caucana (Steindachner, 1880) (Cyprinodontiformes: Poeciliidae)
Published in
Neotropical Ichthyology, January 2016
DOI 10.1590/1982-0224-20150171
Authors

Juan Diego Martínez, Carlos Daniel Cadena, Mauricio Torres

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 20%
Student > Master 7 17%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Professor 4 10%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 59%
Environmental Science 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Chemistry 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2020.
All research outputs
#6,726,276
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from Neotropical Ichthyology
#159
of 763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,491
of 393,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neotropical Ichthyology
#17
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 763 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.