You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Title |
Disability, Medicine, and Ethics
|
---|---|
Published in |
AMA Journal of Ethics, April 2016
|
DOI | 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.fred1-1604 |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 23% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 12% |
India | 1 | 4% |
Italy | 1 | 4% |
South Africa | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 14 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 19 | 73% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 33% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 17% |
Professor | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 33% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |