↓ Skip to main content

Lead-supported germanium nanowire growth

Overview of attention for article published in Materials Letters, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lead-supported germanium nanowire growth
Published in
Materials Letters, June 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.matlet.2016.03.066
Authors

Michael S. Seifner, Patrik Pertl, Johannes Bernardi, Subhajit Biswas, Justin D. Holmes, Sven Barth

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 43%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Researcher 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 4 57%
Materials Science 2 29%
Unknown 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2016.
All research outputs
#10,218,780
of 16,585,337 outputs
Outputs from Materials Letters
#1,619
of 1,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,561
of 266,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Materials Letters
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,585,337 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,942 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.