↓ Skip to main content

Comorbid chronic diseases and cancer diagnosis: disease-specific effects and underlying mechanisms

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
70 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comorbid chronic diseases and cancer diagnosis: disease-specific effects and underlying mechanisms
Published in
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, July 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41571-019-0249-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristina Renzi, Aradhna Kaushal, Jon Emery, Willie Hamilton, Richard D. Neal, Bernard Rachet, Greg Rubin, Hardeep Singh, Fiona M. Walter, Niek J. de Wit, Georgios Lyratzopoulos

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Other 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 15 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2020.
All research outputs
#564,529
of 15,906,874 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
#145
of 1,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,816
of 263,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
#9
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,906,874 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.