You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comorbid chronic diseases and cancer diagnosis: disease-specific effects and underlying mechanisms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41571-019-0249-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cristina Renzi, Aradhna Kaushal, Jon Emery, Willie Hamilton, Richard D. Neal, Bernard Rachet, Greg Rubin, Hardeep Singh, Fiona M. Walter, Niek J. de Wit, Georgios Lyratzopoulos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 20 | 30% |
| United States | 10 | 15% |
| Spain | 4 | 6% |
| Mexico | 4 | 6% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Algeria | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 20 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 51% |
| Scientists | 21 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 132 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 39 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 50 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,008,585
of 25,205,864 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
#248
of 2,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,509
of 352,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
#9
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,205,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.