↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Comorbid chronic diseases and cancer diagnosis: disease-specific effects and underlying mechanisms

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
68 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Facebook Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comorbid chronic diseases and cancer diagnosis: disease-specific effects and underlying mechanisms
Published in
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, July 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41571-019-0249-6
Pubmed ID
31350467
Authors

Cristina Renzi, Aradhna Kaushal, Jon Emery, Willie Hamilton, Richard D. Neal, Bernard Rachet, Greg Rubin, Hardeep Singh, Fiona M. Walter, Niek J. de Wit, Georgios Lyratzopoulos

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 112 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Master 10 9%
Other 7 6%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 28 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 38 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2020.
All research outputs
#946,637
of 23,511,526 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
#229
of 2,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,726
of 347,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
#9
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,511,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.