↓ Skip to main content

Comorbid chronic diseases and cancer diagnosis: disease-specific effects and underlying mechanisms

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
69 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Comorbid chronic diseases and cancer diagnosis: disease-specific effects and underlying mechanisms
Published in
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, July 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41571-019-0249-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristina Renzi, Aradhna Kaushal, Jon Emery, Willie Hamilton, Richard D. Neal, Bernard Rachet, Greg Rubin, Hardeep Singh, Fiona M. Walter, Niek J. de Wit, Georgios Lyratzopoulos

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 29%
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 33%
Unspecified 7 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 3 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2019.
All research outputs
#437,349
of 13,754,586 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
#109
of 1,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,357
of 248,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
#11
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,754,586 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,637 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.