↓ Skip to main content

The downside of aggressive volume administration in critically ill patients—“aggressive” may lead to “excessive”

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Intensive Care, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The downside of aggressive volume administration in critically ill patients—“aggressive” may lead to “excessive”
Published in
Journal of Intensive Care, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40560-019-0360-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenichiro Morisawa, Shigeki Fujitani, Yasuhiko Taira

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 22%
Student > Postgraduate 6 16%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 73%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Psychology 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Unknown 6 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2019.
All research outputs
#18,686,631
of 23,153,184 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#442
of 517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,641
of 438,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#12
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,184 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.