You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Functional hemodynamic tests: a systematic review and a metanalysis on the reliability of the end-expiratory occlusion test and of the mini-fluid challenge in predicting fluid responsiveness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-019-2545-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antonio Messina, Antonio Dell’Anna, Marta Baggiani, Flavia Torrini, Gian Marco Maresca, Victoria Bennett, Laura Saderi, Giovanni Sotgiu, Massimo Antonelli, Maurizio Cecconi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 5 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 5% |
| Brazil | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Iraq | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 8% |
| Scientists | 3 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 22% |
| Unknown | 33 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 49% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 36 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,802,354
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,599
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,571
of 359,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#37
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.