| Title |
A Systematic Review of Behavioral Interventions to Decrease Opioid Prescribing After Surgery.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgery, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1097/sla.0000000000003483 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David D Q Zhang, Jess Sussman, Fahima Dossa, Naheed Jivraj, Karim Ladha, Sav Brar, David Urbach, Andrea C Tricco, Duminda N Wijeysundera, Hance A Clarke, Nancy N Baxter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 25 | 39% |
| United States | 14 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| Iceland | 1 | 2% |
| Honduras | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 48% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 27% |
| Scientists | 15 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 23% |
| Unknown | 22 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 25 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,016,100
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgery
#566
of 9,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,514
of 473,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgery
#22
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.