You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exploiting the Campylobacter jejuni protein glycosylation system for glycoengineering vaccines and diagnostic tools directed against brucellosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbial Cell Factories, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2859-11-13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeremy A Iwashkiw, Messele A Fentabil, Amirreza Faridmoayer, Dominic C Mills, Mark Peppler, Cecilia Czibener, Andres E Ciocchini, Diego J Comerci, Juan E Ugalde, Mario F Feldman |
| Abstract |
Immune responses directed towards surface polysaccharides conjugated to proteins are effective in preventing colonization and infection of bacterial pathogens. Presently, the production of these conjugate vaccines requires intricate synthetic chemistry for obtaining, activating, and attaching the polysaccharides to protein carriers. Glycoproteins generated by engineering bacterial glycosylation machineries have been proposed to be a viable alternative to traditional conjugation methods. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| Kenya | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 23% |
| Researcher | 19 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 13 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 22% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 8% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2012.
All research outputs
#18,305,470
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Cell Factories
#1,186
of 1,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,378
of 246,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Cell Factories
#30
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,581 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.