↓ Skip to main content

Personal infidelity and professional conduct in 4 settings

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
41 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
236 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Personal infidelity and professional conduct in 4 settings
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2019
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1905329116
Pubmed ID
Authors

John M. Griffin, Samuel Kruger, Gonzalo Maturana

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 236 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Professor 3 10%
Other 10 32%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 13%
Computer Science 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Other 8 26%
Unknown 5 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 505. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2020.
All research outputs
#22,809
of 15,900,308 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#691
of 86,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#601
of 263,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#27
of 933 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,900,308 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 86,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 933 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.