↓ Skip to main content

Personal infidelity and professional conduct in 4 settings

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
41 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
249 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
Title
Personal infidelity and professional conduct in 4 settings
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2019
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1905329116
Pubmed ID
Authors

John M. Griffin, Samuel Kruger, Gonzalo Maturana

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 249 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 523. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2019.
All research outputs
#15,295
of 13,643,018 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#498
of 80,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#542
of 245,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#25
of 927 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,643,018 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 80,787 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 927 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.