You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improvements in the Interpretation of Volcanic Hazard Maps by Presentation of Drill Maps
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Map, Journal of the Japan Cartographers Association, December 2007
|
| DOI | 10.11212/jjca1963.45.4_1 |
| Authors |
Shin MURAKOSHI, Masato KOYAMA |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 5 | 45% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 91% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2019.
All research outputs
#5,426,179
of 25,507,011 outputs
Outputs from Map, Journal of the Japan Cartographers Association
#19
of 124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,225
of 167,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Map, Journal of the Japan Cartographers Association
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,507,011 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them