You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A cross-sectional study of the associations between the traditional Japanese diet and nutrient intakes: the NILS-LSA project
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-019-0468-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shu Zhang, Rei Otsuka, Yasutake Tomata, Hiroshi Shimokata, Chikako Tange, Makiko Tomida, Yukiko Nishita, Sanae Matsuyama, Ichiro Tsuji |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 17 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2020.
All research outputs
#15,380,506
of 24,379,758 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#1,117
of 1,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,285
of 349,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#14
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,379,758 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.