↓ Skip to main content

A cross-sectional study of the associations between the traditional Japanese diet and nutrient intakes: the NILS-LSA project

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A cross-sectional study of the associations between the traditional Japanese diet and nutrient intakes: the NILS-LSA project
Published in
Nutrition Journal, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12937-019-0468-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shu Zhang, Rei Otsuka, Yasutake Tomata, Hiroshi Shimokata, Chikako Tange, Makiko Tomida, Yukiko Nishita, Sanae Matsuyama, Ichiro Tsuji

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Lecturer 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 13 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 8 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 12 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2020.
All research outputs
#13,014,862
of 20,223,269 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#1,060
of 1,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,143
of 278,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,223,269 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them