↓ Skip to main content

Ultrasound-guided transvaginal ovarian needle drilling for clomiphene-resistant polycystic ovarian syndrome in subfertile women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ultrasound-guided transvaginal ovarian needle drilling for clomiphene-resistant polycystic ovarian syndrome in subfertile women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008583.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Zhang, Liulin Tang, Linglingli Kong, Taixiang Wu, Liangzhi Xu, Xin Pan, Guan J Liu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 21%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 10 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2019.
All research outputs
#8,886,463
of 14,674,316 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,173
of 11,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,011
of 256,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,674,316 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,038 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.