You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Perspectives of patients with type 1 or insulin-treated type 2 diabetes on self-monitoring of blood glucose: a qualitative study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, March 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-167 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Johanna Hortensius, Marijke C Kars, Willem S Wierenga, Nanne Kleefstra, Henk JG Bilo, Jaap J van der Bijl |
Abstract |
Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), including self-regulation, is an important tool to achieve good glycemic control. However, many patients measure their glucose concentrations less often than is recommended. This study investigates patients' perspectives of SMBG and all relevant aspects influencing SMBG in patients with type 1 and insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 2 | 20% |
United States | 2 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 10% |
Peru | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 172 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 26 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 6% |
Researcher | 10 | 6% |
Other | 26 | 15% |
Unknown | 74 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 21% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 13 | 7% |
Psychology | 11 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Other | 15 | 8% |
Unknown | 79 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2017.
All research outputs
#737,994
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#756
of 15,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,541
of 157,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#6
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.