↓ Skip to main content

Global change-driven use of onshore habitat impacts polar bear faecal microbiota

Overview of attention for article published in The ISME Journal, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
65 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global change-driven use of onshore habitat impacts polar bear faecal microbiota
Published in
The ISME Journal, August 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41396-019-0480-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophie E Watson, Heidi C Hauffe, Matthew J Bull, Todd C Atwood, Melissa A McKinney, Massimo Pindo, Sarah E Perkins

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Master 7 10%
Other 5 7%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 21 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 21%
Environmental Science 8 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 11%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 30 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2020.
All research outputs
#806,506
of 25,530,891 outputs
Outputs from The ISME Journal
#266
of 3,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,050
of 358,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The ISME Journal
#14
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,530,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.