You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Immunization with mannosylated nanovaccines and inhibition of the immune-suppressing microenvironment sensitizes melanoma to immune checkpoint modulators
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Nanotechnology, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41565-019-0512-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
João Conniot, Anna Scomparin, Carina Peres, Eilam Yeini, Sabina Pozzi, Ana I. Matos, Ron Kleiner, Liane I. F. Moura, Eva Zupančič, Ana S. Viana, Hila Doron, Pedro M. P. Gois, Neta Erez, Steffen Jung, Ronit Satchi-Fainaro, Helena F. Florindo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 14% |
| Israel | 8 | 10% |
| Portugal | 4 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| China | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 40 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 49 | 62% |
| Scientists | 23 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 224 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 14% |
| Researcher | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Unknown | 68 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 35 | 16% |
| Chemistry | 22 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 19 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 17% |
| Unknown | 84 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 219. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2020.
All research outputs
#178,984
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Nanotechnology
#108
of 3,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,329
of 360,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Nanotechnology
#2
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.