↓ Skip to main content

Regulatory and policy tools to address unproven stem cell interventions in Canada: the need for action

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
45 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Regulatory and policy tools to address unproven stem cell interventions in Canada: the need for action
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, August 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12910-019-0388-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy Caulfield, Blake Murdoch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Other 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Master 3 7%
Professor 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 17 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Social Sciences 5 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 7%
Psychology 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 17 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2021.
All research outputs
#995,225
of 25,138,857 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#65
of 1,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,188
of 351,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,138,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.