↓ Skip to main content

Therapeutic PD-L1 antibodies are more effective than PD-1 antibodies in blocking PD-1/PD-L1 signaling

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
87 X users
patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Therapeutic PD-L1 antibodies are more effective than PD-1 antibodies in blocking PD-1/PD-L1 signaling
Published in
Scientific Reports, August 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-47910-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annika De Sousa Linhares, Claire Battin, Sabrina Jutz, Judith Leitner, Christine Hafner, Joshua Tobias, Ursula Wiedermann, Michael Kundi, Gerhard J. Zlabinger, Katharina Grabmeier-Pfistershammer, Peter Steinberger

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 87 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 221 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 14%
Researcher 29 13%
Student > Master 27 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Other 12 5%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 84 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 23 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 90 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#778,211
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#8,418
of 142,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,252
of 357,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#213
of 3,504 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,504 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.