↓ Skip to main content

Optimizing the performance of microbial fuel cells fed a combination of different synthetic organic fractions in municipal solid waste

Overview of attention for article published in Waste Management, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Optimizing the performance of microbial fuel cells fed a combination of different synthetic organic fractions in municipal solid waste
Published in
Waste Management, March 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.12.032
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brahmaiah Pendyala, Subba Rao Chaganti, Jerald A. Lalman, Daniel D. Heath

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 23%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Professor 4 7%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 15 25%
Engineering 11 18%
Chemical Engineering 5 8%
Chemistry 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 14 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2019.
All research outputs
#12,404,860
of 15,606,390 outputs
Outputs from Waste Management
#1,125
of 1,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,649
of 262,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Waste Management
#27
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,606,390 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.