↓ Skip to main content

Understanding how and why de-implementation works in health and care: research protocol for a realist synthesis of evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
56 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding how and why de-implementation works in health and care: research protocol for a realist synthesis of evidence
Published in
Systematic Reviews, August 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13643-019-1111-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Burton, Lynne Williams, Tracey Bucknall, Stephen Edwards, Denise Fisher, Beth Hall, Gill Harris, Peter Jones, Matthew Makin, Anne McBride, Rachel Meacock, John Parkinson, Jo Rycroft-Malone, Justin Waring

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Student > Master 2 17%
Unknown 5 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 17%
Computer Science 1 8%
Psychology 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Unknown 7 58%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2020.
All research outputs
#597,738
of 14,964,401 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#115
of 1,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,929
of 257,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,964,401 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,311 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them