↓ Skip to main content

Is securitization theory racist? Civilizationism, methodological whiteness, and antiblack thought in the Copenhagen School

Overview of attention for article published in Security Dialogue, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 379)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
96 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is securitization theory racist? Civilizationism, methodological whiteness, and antiblack thought in the Copenhagen School
Published in
Security Dialogue, August 2019
DOI 10.1177/0967010619862921
Authors

Howell, Alison, Richter-Montpetit, Melanie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2019.
All research outputs
#209,664
of 13,408,534 outputs
Outputs from Security Dialogue
#1
of 379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,689
of 167,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Security Dialogue
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,408,534 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them