↓ Skip to main content

Distribution differences in prognostic copy number alteration profiles in IDH-wild-type glioblastoma cause survival discrepancies across cohorts

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica Communications, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Distribution differences in prognostic copy number alteration profiles in IDH-wild-type glioblastoma cause survival discrepancies across cohorts
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica Communications, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40478-019-0749-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Toru Umehara, Hideyuki Arita, Ema Yoshioka, Tomoko Shofuda, Daisuke Kanematsu, Manabu Kinoshita, Yoshinori Kodama, Masayuki Mano, Naoki Kagawa, Yasunori Fujimoto, Yoshiko Okita, Masahiro Nonaka, Kosuke Nakajo, Takehiro Uda, Naohiro Tsuyuguchi, Junya Fukai, Koji Fujita, Daisuke Sakamoto, Kanji Mori, Haruhiko Kishima, Yonehiro Kanemura

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 9 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Decision Sciences 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 10 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,034,206
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#61
of 1,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,520
of 351,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#5
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,403 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.