↓ Skip to main content

Association of Hospital Spending Intensity With Mortality and Readmission Rates in Ontario Hospitals

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
7 blogs
twitter
59 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
Title
Association of Hospital Spending Intensity With Mortality and Readmission Rates in Ontario Hospitals
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, March 2012
DOI 10.1001/jama.2012.265
Pubmed ID
Authors

Therese A. Stukel, Elliott S. Fisher, David A. Alter, Astrid Guttmann, Dennis T. Ko, Kinwah Fung, Walter P. Wodchis, Nancy N. Baxter, Craig C. Earle, Douglas S. Lee

Abstract

The extent to which better spending produces higher-quality care and better patient outcomes in a universal health care system with selective access to medical technology is unknown.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 8 4%
United States 5 3%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Armenia 1 <1%
Unknown 169 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 21%
Student > Master 22 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 8%
Other 56 30%
Unknown 17 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Social Sciences 15 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 29 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2018.
All research outputs
#213,118
of 15,149,282 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#3,358
of 27,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,211
of 124,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#18
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,149,282 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.