Title |
Association of Hospital Spending Intensity With Mortality and Readmission Rates in Ontario Hospitals
|
---|---|
Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, March 2012
|
DOI | 10.1001/jama.2012.265 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Therese A. Stukel, Elliott S. Fisher, David A. Alter, Astrid Guttmann, Dennis T. Ko, Kinwah Fung, Walter P. Wodchis, Nancy N. Baxter, Craig C. Earle, Douglas S. Lee |
Abstract |
The extent to which better spending produces higher-quality care and better patient outcomes in a universal health care system with selective access to medical technology is unknown. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 12 | 24% |
Canada | 12 | 24% |
Sweden | 2 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
Japan | 2 | 4% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Gibraltar | 1 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Chile | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 17 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 31 | 61% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 18% |
Scientists | 8 | 16% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 7 | 3% |
United States | 5 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Armenia | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 227 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 43 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 33 | 13% |
Student > Master | 29 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 18 | 7% |
Other | 63 | 26% |
Unknown | 38 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 90 | 37% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 17 | 7% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 14 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 4% |
Other | 32 | 13% |
Unknown | 52 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2018.
All research outputs
#482,329
of 25,610,986 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#5,290
of 36,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,124
of 169,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#20
of 342 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,610,986 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 342 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.