↓ Skip to main content

Association of Hospital Spending Intensity With Mortality and Readmission Rates in Ontario Hospitals

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
7 blogs
twitter
59 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
Title
Association of Hospital Spending Intensity With Mortality and Readmission Rates in Ontario Hospitals
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, March 2012
DOI 10.1001/jama.2012.265
Pubmed ID
Authors

Therese A. Stukel, Elliott S. Fisher, David A. Alter, Astrid Guttmann, Dennis T. Ko, Kinwah Fung, Walter P. Wodchis, Nancy N. Baxter, Craig C. Earle, Douglas S. Lee

Abstract

The extent to which better spending produces higher-quality care and better patient outcomes in a universal health care system with selective access to medical technology is unknown.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 8 4%
United States 5 3%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Armenia 1 <1%
Unknown 163 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Student > Master 21 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Other 54 30%
Unknown 15 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 44%
Social Sciences 16 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 25 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2018.
All research outputs
#166,399
of 13,261,910 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#2,810
of 25,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,035
of 119,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#15
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,261,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.