You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Maternal death inquiry and response in India - the impact of contextual factors on defining an optimal model to help meet critical maternal health policy objectives
|
---|---|
Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, November 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1478-4505-9-41 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Henry D Kalter, Pavitra Mohan, Archana Mishra, Narayan Gaonkar, Akhil B Biswas, Sudha Balakrishnan, Gaurav Arya, Marzio Babille |
Abstract |
Maternal death reviews have been utilized in several countries as a means of identifying social and health care quality issues affecting maternal survival. From 2005 to 2009, a standardized community-based maternal death inquiry and response initiative was implemented in eight Indian states with the aim of addressing critical maternal health policy objectives. However, state-specific contextual factors strongly influenced the effort's success. This paper examines the impact and implications of the contextual factors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
India | 2 | <1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Ghana | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 197 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 44 | 22% |
Researcher | 38 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
Other | 28 | 14% |
Unknown | 42 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 31% |
Social Sciences | 39 | 19% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 5% |
Psychology | 3 | 1% |
Other | 12 | 6% |
Unknown | 50 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2019.
All research outputs
#6,911,735
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#787
of 1,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,021
of 239,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.