You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interspecific competition among catch crops modifies vertical root biomass distribution and nitrate scavenging in soils
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-48060-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Diana Heuermann, Norman Gentsch, Jens Boy, Dörte Schweneker, Ulf Feuerstein, Jonas Groß, Bernhard Bauer, Georg Guggenberger, Nicolaus von Wirén |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 23 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 25 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2019.
All research outputs
#20,576,667
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#107,124
of 125,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,283
of 345,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2,949
of 3,467 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,467 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.