↓ Skip to main content

Creating an audience: Experiences from the Surinamese slave registers crowdsourcing project

Overview of attention for article published in Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 112)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Creating an audience: Experiences from the Surinamese slave registers crowdsourcing project
Published in
Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, August 2019
DOI 10.1080/01615440.2019.1590268
Authors

Cornelis W. Van Galen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 40%
Unspecified 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 40%
Unspecified 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,843,232
of 15,634,343 outputs
Outputs from Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History
#44
of 112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,882
of 262,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,634,343 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.