You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The ideal of biopsychosocial chronic care: How to make it real? A qualitative study among Dutch stakeholders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Primary Care, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2296-13-14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anneke van Dijk-de Vries, Albine Moser, Vera-Christina Mertens, Jikke van der Linden, Trudy van der Weijden, Jacques Th. M van Eijk |
| Abstract |
Chronically ill patients often experience psychosocial problems in everyday life. A biopsychosocial approach is considered to be essential in chronic care. In Dutch primary health care the current biomedically oriented clinical practice may conflict with the biopsychosocial approach. This study is aimed to explore the views of Dutch stakeholders on achieving a biopsychosocial approach to the care of patients with chronic diseases. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 150 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 14% |
| Researcher | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 16% |
| Unknown | 42 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 19% |
| Psychology | 14 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 49 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2012.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#2,212
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,285
of 168,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#22
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.