↓ Skip to main content

The effect of blood pressure calibrations and transcranial Doppler signal loss on transfer function estimates of cerebral autoregulation

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Engineering & Physics, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of blood pressure calibrations and transcranial Doppler signal loss on transfer function estimates of cerebral autoregulation
Published in
Medical Engineering & Physics, June 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.12.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian M. Deegan, Jorge M. Serrador, Kazuma Nakagawa, Edward Jones, Farzaneh A. Sorond, Gearóid ÓLaighin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Netherlands 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 29 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 22%
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Professor 3 9%
Unspecified 3 9%
Other 8 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 41%
Unspecified 5 16%
Engineering 5 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 13%
Neuroscience 3 9%
Other 2 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2016.
All research outputs
#6,436,408
of 12,288,537 outputs
Outputs from Medical Engineering & Physics
#403
of 655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,403
of 279,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Engineering & Physics
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,288,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 655 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.