↓ Skip to main content

Non-fluoride topical remineralising agents containing calcium and/or phosphate for controlling dental caries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-fluoride topical remineralising agents containing calcium and/or phosphate for controlling dental caries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009732
Authors

Carmel Parnell, Neeraj Gugnani, Andrea Sherriff, Patrice James, Paul V Beirne

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Master 5 14%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 8 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 63%
Psychology 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 6 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2015.
All research outputs
#2,615,305
of 15,917,403 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,315
of 11,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,815
of 125,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,917,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.