You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Increases in general practice workload in England
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00743-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew Thompson, Fiona Walter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 45% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 61% |
| Scientists | 6 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 20% |
| Unknown | 14 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 49% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2018.
All research outputs
#631,027
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#5,519
of 42,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,526
of 315,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#108
of 477 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 477 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.