↓ Skip to main content

最適化アルゴリズムの新展開-内点法とその周辺-I : 概要と歴史、線形計画問題に対する主内点法

Overview of attention for article published in SYSTEMS, CONTROL AND INFORMATION, April 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
最適化アルゴリズムの新展開-内点法とその周辺-I : 概要と歴史、線形計画問題に対する主内点法
Published in
SYSTEMS, CONTROL AND INFORMATION, April 1998
DOI 10.11509/isciesci.42.4_218
Authors

土谷 隆

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2019.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from SYSTEMS, CONTROL AND INFORMATION
#71
of 127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,985
of 32,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SYSTEMS, CONTROL AND INFORMATION
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them