↓ Skip to main content

Physicochemical models of effusive rhyolitic eruptions constrained with InSAR and DEM data: A case study of the 2011-2012 Cordón Caulle eruption

Overview of attention for article published in Earth & Planetary Science Letters, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physicochemical models of effusive rhyolitic eruptions constrained with InSAR and DEM data: A case study of the 2011-2012 Cordón Caulle eruption
Published in
Earth & Planetary Science Letters, October 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.epsl.2019.115736
Authors

Francisco Delgado, Julia Kubanek, Kyle Anderson, Paul Lundgren, Matthew Pritchard

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 33%
Researcher 3 25%
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Other 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 75%
Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,987,469
of 15,606,051 outputs
Outputs from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#1,179
of 3,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,861
of 262,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#33
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,606,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.