↓ Skip to main content

Status and potential of bacterial genomics for public health practice: a scoping review

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Status and potential of bacterial genomics for public health practice: a scoping review
Published in
Implementation Science, August 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13012-019-0930-2
Authors

Nina Van Goethem, Tine Descamps, Brecht Devleesschauwer, Nancy H. C. Roosens, Nele A. M. Boon, Herman Van Oyen, Annie Robert

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 24%
Other 3 18%
Researcher 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 4 24%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 2 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,777,163
of 13,851,031 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,162
of 1,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,479
of 251,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,851,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.