↓ Skip to main content

Francisella tularensis subsp. novicida isolated from a human in Arizona

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Francisella tularensis subsp. novicida isolated from a human in Arizona
Published in
BMC Research Notes, November 2009
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-2-223
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dawn N Birdsell, Tasha Stewart, Amy J Vogler, Elisabeth Lawaczeck, Alisa Diggs, Tammy L Sylvester, Jordan L Buchhagen, Raymond K Auerbach, Paul Keim, David M Wagner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Sweden 1 4%
Unknown 26 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 14%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 21%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,376
of 4,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,719
of 108,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.