You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparing the Lifestyle Interventions for Prediabetes: An Integrated Microsimulation and Population Simulation Model
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientific Reports, August 2019
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-48312-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Amin Khademi, Lu Shi, Amir Ali Nasrollahzadeh, Hariharaprabhu Narayanan, Liwei Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 14% |
Chile | 1 | 14% |
Austria | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 28% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
Psychology | 1 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Decision Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,594,984
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#51,818
of 125,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,718
of 341,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,488
of 3,439 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,439 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.