↓ Skip to main content

Effect of mechanically stimulated saliva on initial human dental biofilm formation

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of mechanically stimulated saliva on initial human dental biofilm formation
Published in
Scientific Reports, August 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-48211-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Taichi Inui, Robert J. Palmer, Nehal Shah, Wei Li, John O. Cisar, Christine D. Wu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 21%
Student > Bachelor 6 18%
Student > Master 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Chemistry 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2019.
All research outputs
#18,687,330
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#94,805
of 125,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,126
of 342,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2,594
of 3,439 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,439 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.