↓ Skip to main content

Managing uncertain recovery for patients nearing the end of life in hospital: a mixed-methods feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of the AMBER care bundle

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
46 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Managing uncertain recovery for patients nearing the end of life in hospital: a mixed-methods feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of the AMBER care bundle
Published in
Trials, August 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13063-019-3612-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Koffman, E. Yorganci, D. Yi, W. Gao, F. Murtagh, A. Pickles, S. Barclay, H. Johnson, R. Wilson, L. Sampson, J. Droney, M. Farquhar, T. Prevost, C. J. Evans

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Student > Master 8 15%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 13 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 12 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 20%
Psychology 6 11%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 13 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2020.
All research outputs
#869,652
of 17,837,438 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#211
of 4,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,667
of 271,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,837,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them