↓ Skip to main content

Seven Reasons Why: A User’s Guide to Transparency and Reproducibility *

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Political Science Review (Online), January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 159)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
25 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Seven Reasons Why: A User’s Guide to Transparency and Reproducibility *
Published in
Brazilian Political Science Review (Online), January 2019
DOI 10.1590/1981-3821201900020001
Authors

Dalson Figueiredo Filho, Rodrigo Lins, Amanda Domingos, Nicole Janz, Lucas Silva

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Master 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Other 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 8 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 10 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Computer Science 3 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 8 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2024.
All research outputs
#1,145,436
of 26,626,138 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Political Science Review (Online)
#5
of 159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,249
of 452,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Political Science Review (Online)
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,626,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.