↓ Skip to main content

Interspecies interactions and potential Influenza A virus risk in small swine farms in Peru

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interspecies interactions and potential Influenza A virus risk in small swine farms in Peru
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-12-58
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah McCune, Carmen S Arriola, Robert H Gilman, Martín A Romero, Viterbo Ayvar, Vitaliano A Cama, Joel M Montgomery, Armando E Gonzales, Angela M Bayer

Abstract

The recent avian influenza epidemic in Asia and the H1N1 pandemic demonstrated that influenza A viruses pose a threat to global public health. The animal origins of the viruses confirmed the potential for interspecies transmission. Swine are hypothesized to be prime "mixing vessels" due to the dual receptivity of their trachea to human and avian strains. Additionally, avian and human influenza viruses have previously been isolated in swine. Therefore, understanding interspecies contact on smallholder swine farms and its potential role in the transmission of pathogens such as influenza virus is very important.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 87 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Unspecified 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 21 23%
Unknown 21 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 8%
Unspecified 7 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 23 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2012.
All research outputs
#13,128,816
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3,142
of 7,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,521
of 156,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#30
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.