You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The amount of late gadolinium enhancement outperforms current guideline-recommended criteria in the identification of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy at risk of sudden cardiac death
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-019-0561-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pedro Freitas, António Miguel Ferreira, Edmundo Arteaga-Fernández, Murrilo de Oliveira Antunes, João Mesquita, João Abecasis, Hugo Marques, Carla Saraiva, Daniel Nascimento Matos, Rita Rodrigues, Nuno Cardim, Charles Mady, Carlos Eduardo Rochitte |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 12% |
| Argentina | 5 | 6% |
| Spain | 5 | 6% |
| Chile | 2 | 2% |
| Russia | 2 | 2% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 1% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 31 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 48 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 17% |
| Scientists | 12 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 19% |
| Unknown | 29 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 51% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 41 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2022.
All research outputs
#875,243
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#22
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,306
of 353,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.